Mocking Callbacks And Components

React Course


We’ve already covered some basics of React testing. Now’s the time to dive deeper.

In this lesson, we’ll learn about mocking. Furthermore, we’ll discuss a React component from this ( website and understand how React tests are written in a real world application.

Lesson overview

This section contains a general overview of topics that you will learn in this lesson.

  • Carry out mocks in the context of React testing.

What is mocking?

If you’ve been following along with our lessons so far, the concept of mocking has already been introduced in an earlier section and you might have even incorporated mocks in your Battleship project. Let’s look at how mocks will help in testing React components.

Testing callback handlers

Callbacks are ubiquitous. Every avenue of user interaction involves callbacks. Sometimes they’re passed in as props to alter state of the parent component. Consider this button component:

// CustomButton.jsx

const CustomButton = ({ onClick }) => {
  return (
    <button onClick={onClick}>Click me</button> 

export default CustomButton;

Nothing fancy. CustomButton is a component with a prop passed in. We’re interested in the onClick prop. We have no idea what the function does. We have no idea how the function will affect the application. All we know is it must be called when the user clicks the button. Let’s test it.

Notice how we mock and test the onClick function:

// CustomButton.test.jsx

import { vi } from 'vitest'
import { render, screen } from "@testing-library/react";
import userEvent from "@testing-library/user-event";
import CustomButton from "./CustomButton";

describe("CustomButton", () => {
    it("should render a button with the text 'Click me'", () => {
        render(<CustomButton onClick={() => {}} />);

        const button = screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Click me" });

    it("should call the onClick function when clicked", async () => {
        const onClick = vi.fn();
        const user = userEvent.setup()
        render(<CustomButton onClick={onClick} />);

        const button = screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Click me" });



    it("should not call the onClick function when it isn't clicked", async () => {
        const onClick = vi.fn();
        render(<CustomButton onClick={onClick} />);


Three tests and we are done with this component. You should be already familiar with how the first test works. Take some time to figure out what functions come from which package.

For the second and third tests, we mock the onClick handler using one of Vitest’s functions, vi.fn(). Then we assert that it is called/not called when the button is clicked or not.

You could also set up your mocks in a beforeEach block instead of in every test block. This may be suitable for some situations. However, for better readability, it is recommended that all setups be done in the same test block. Doing so eliminates the need to search through the entire file for context, making it easier to review future changes. This also decreases the chance of having leakage create problems throughout the test suite. Unless your test file is particularly long and the test preparation takes up dozens of lines, it is recommended to set up your mocks in each test block; otherwise, you may use beforeEach.

It is recommended to invoke userEvent.setup() before rendering the component. It is discouraged to call renders and userEvent functions outside of the test itself, (for example, in a beforeEach block). If you find yourself repeating the same code in multiple tests, the recommended approach to shorten each test is to write a setup function.

Mocking child components

You might have come across the concept of mocking modules. In React, when the component tree gets large, tests can become convoluted. Especially for components higher up the tree. That’s why we mock child components. This is not something you’ll come across often, nevertheless, it’s beneficial to realize the concept in case you might need it in your own testing pursuits.

React testing in the real world

If you’re logged in on this ( website, you’ve probably come across the project submissions list under every project. Those components were written in React and tested with the React Testing Library. They have since been removed, but they still serve as great examples. This’ll be fun. Your task is:

Read and try to comprehend the submissions-list.jsx component. It’s okay if you don’t understand everything. And the good news is that we don’t have to understand it all to follow along with this lesson!


We start by importing a bunch of stuff like any other decent React component. There might be a couple of unfamiliar things on there; we don’t have to worry too much about them. If we take a glance at the props, there are some functions in there, presumably event handlers. Let’s look at what the component renders.

  1. If there’s a userSubmission, it renders the Submission component.
  2. If hasSubmissions is true, sort the submissions and render them with Submission. Otherwise, a heading that says “No Submissions yet, be the first!”
  3. If allSubmissionsPath is true, it renders a <p> tag.

Just going through the code, it should give us some idea of what to test. It will be rewarding if you take a couple of seconds to map out what tests we could need for SubmissionsList.

Go through its test file, submissions-list.test.jsx. Again, don’t worry if all of it doesn’t make sense, we’ll chew over it shortly.


While the test suite above uses data-test-id to identify mocked child components, it must be remembered that the React Testing Library instead uses data-testid by default.


We notice there are two child components of SubmissionsList. One of them is from a package called react-flip-move. External Code. We’ll mock it.

Notice how we mock the Submission component:

jest.mock('../submission', () => ({ submission, isDashboardView }) => (
    <div data-test-id="submission">{}</div>
    <div data-test-id="dashboard">{isDashboardView.toString()}</div>

We only render the bare minimum to realize the validity of the component we’re testing. Next, we set up our props with fake data and mocked functions.

Note - Vitest mocks

The test here used jest.mock(). If you followed along and set up your test using Vitest, you may use vi.mock() instead. See vi.mock() API.

Let’s move toward our first assertion. Don’t worry too much about the ProjectSubmissionContext.Provider. In the context of this test, its purpose is to act as a route to pass in the allSubmissionsPath prop. We’ve already identified the three points of interest that we want to test. We divide them into three test suites for readability purposes using describe.

In the first suite, we make some assertions if the user has a submission and then some assertions if the user does not. The other suites follow a similar pattern.

Exploring further

Feel free to flick through the other components and their tests. You’ll see mocked functions. You’ll see some unseen functions like act. You’ll see custom render functions. It’s fine if you don’t understand it all, the goal is to gain familiarity.

The other important thing to note is almost all the tests follow a certain pattern in terms of the way they’re written. They follow the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern. It’s a good idea to adopt this pattern sooner or later to make your tests more readable and ultimately better.


  1. Read about the secrets of act(…) api. Especially pay attention to the last bit about testing asynchronous code. You won’t be using it everyday, but it’s nice to be familiar. Please note that in the article, the React components are written within the tests.

  2. Read this article about mocking child components. It extensively covers the “how” of mocking child components. (You might need to sign up to read)

Knowledge check

The following questions are an opportunity to reflect on key topics in this lesson. If you can’t answer a question, click on it to review the material, but keep in mind you are not expected to memorize or master this knowledge.

Additional resources

This section contains helpful links to related content. It isn’t required, so consider it supplemental.

  • Dive deeper into act() and understand its most common warning and when act() is not necessary.

Support us!

The Odin Project is funded by the community. Join us in empowering learners around the globe by supporting The Odin Project!